Built for
what’s next.
A boutique luxury multifamily vision for an assumed 0.75-acre site. Site photographs, design direction and preliminary financial projections in one investor-ready overview.
The site today.
These are the two most recent uploaded images. Parcel identity, exact boundary, existing conditions and suitability for development have not been independently verified.
Luxury with an
efficient footprint.
A proposed 20-residence community with a vehicle-accessible automated gate, thoughtfully arranged parking and refined Midwest landscaping.
Early design direction: approximately four 3-story buildings; light neutral exteriors with masonry accents; large windows; patios or balconies; warm contemporary interiors; durable, repeatable finish packages.
Concept only. No site plan, access design, unit count, building area, zoning entitlement, fire access, stormwater design or parking approval has been established.
Residences with
room to live.
Warm contemporary luxury
Natural oak tones, soft ivory surfaces, subtle stone-look porcelain, quartz kitchens, large islands, generous glazing and carefully chosen black or champagne-bronze accents.
Premium end units may add corner windows and upgraded views. Finishes, layouts and sizes remain illustrative.
Living beautifully,
every day.
Open living + kitchen
A generous island anchors the kitchen, dining and living areas. Warm oak, ivory cabinetry, quartz surfaces and large windows establish a consistent design language.
Illustrative design intent. Furnishings, views, geometry and finishes are subject to architectural design and budget.
A quiet private suite.
Bedroom + spa bath
A king-size primary room pairs neutral textiles and oak flooring with a glass shower, double vanity and warm stone-look porcelain.
Illustrative concept only; no floor plan or finish schedule has been approved.
Arrival, architecture
and community.
A cohesive address
The concept depicts a gated vehicle entrance, four residential buildings, landscaped circulation, a gathering space and contemporary Midwest exterior materials.
This is an artistic rendering, not an approved site plan. Its depicted building, unit, parking and coverage figures require survey, zoning, civil engineering and design verification.
A working budget
of $8.7 million.
| Category | Working allowance |
|---|---|
| Building and site construction | $6,950,000 |
| Design, engineering, permits and soft costs | $950,000 |
| Construction contingency | $450,000 |
| Other owner / development allowances | $350,000 |
| Preliminary total | $8,700,000 |
Approximately $272–$290 per gross building square foot using a 32,000–30,000 SF gross area range.
The previously supplied detailed construction ranges sum to about $7.0M–$9.35M, above the stated $6.5M–$7.5M subtotal. The $8.7M figure is a top-level planning case, not a reconciled bid.
Previous broad scenarios: $7.8M cost controlled; $8.7M target; $9.6M high case. These exclude land purchase, construction-loan interest and lender fees, and developer fee/profit. Some site or municipal charges could vary materially.
Projected revenue,
three lenses.
| Scenario | 2BR / month | 3BR / month | Gross / month | Gross / year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | $2,200 | $2,700 | $46,000 | $552,000 |
| Working case | $2,450 | $3,100 | $51,600 | $619,200 |
| Strong market | $2,600 | $3,400 | $55,200 | $662,400 |
Gross scheduled residential rent assumes all 16 two-bedroom and 4 three-bedroom units leased at the shown rates for 12 months. These are earlier illustrative assumptions; no parcel-specific rent comparables have been established.
What the numbers
are telling us.
| Working-case bridge | Annual |
|---|---|
| Scheduled residential rent | $619,200 |
| Less assumed 5% vacancy / credit loss | ($30,960) |
| Plus illustrative other income | $24,000 |
| Effective gross income | $612,240 |
| Operating costs at 30%–35% of EGI | ($183,672)–($214,284) |
| Indicative NOI | $397,956–$428,568 |
Indicative NOI divided by the $8.7M planning cost, before land, financing and other omitted development costs. The earlier central estimate of ~$415k NOI equates to ~4.8%.
Previous density illustrations: 24 units at $2,300 average rent = $662,400 gross annual rent; 28 units at $2,250 = $756,000. Neither is a feasibility finding, cost estimate or profit projection.
Validate. Design.
Underwrite.
Confirm the parcel
Survey, title, boundaries, easements, existing structures and utility capacity. Determine the correct Missouri jurisdiction.
Establish the envelope
Verify zoning, permitted density, setbacks, height, parking, fire access, stormwater and site work requirements.
Compare schemes
Price 16, 20, 24 and 28-unit layouts where legally possible. Obtain local rental comparables and contractor budgets.
For a parcel within Kansas City, Missouri, the city provides zoning verification, development fees and development review guidance. Applicability depends on the actual municipality.
Concept presentation · September 2026 · Not an appraisal, architectural plan, contractor bid, entitlement determination or investment offer.